The Value of Expository Preaching
by Michael L. Gowens
I believe that sustained expository preaching, under the blessings of God the
Holy Spirit, builds strong, mature believers. Even though each message is a
complete message in and of itself (that is, has a theme, an explanation of that
theme, and an application of it to life), yet each also builds on the other to
form the "big picture," like one layer of bricks on top of another
slowly rising into a wall.
This kind of preaching corresponds to the basic goal of public worship. Public
worship is intended to facilitate spiritual growth. I believe in expository
preaching, therefore, because it tends, by its very nature, to motivate a
growth, not an entertainment mentality.
Today, most Christians, I fear. think of church attendance as an occasion for
spiritual refueling; they have no concept of the priority God's word gives to
the idea of 'growth.' The church assembled is to them what a gas station is to
the car. a place to replenish what is consumed during the week. No doubt. public
worship does provide such spiritual renewal and refreshment. But the biblical
ideal for the Christian life is not a matter of spending and refilling, but a
matter of maintaining what one has received and then adding to it progressively
so that there is positive growth (I Cor. 15:2, I Thess, 4:1,10, Col. 1:9-10),
etc,). The brick wall, not the petro station, is the best metaphor.
The goal is actual growth and development from one Sunday to the next. Most
people, however, have a survival mentality toward the Christian life. They see
public worship as a refreshment stand in a marathon race. "If I can just
survive until the next energy boost, then I can make it." Again. 1 concede
that there is rest for the weary as one sits under the proclamation of the
gospel. but this temporary benefit should never obscure the greater, long-term
goal of actual progress toward spiritual maturity.
Expository preaching, by its very nature of connecting one verse to the next,
one chapter to the next, and one Sunday to the next, cultivates a mentality that
thinks in terms of progression instead of equilibrium. In other words, the
carryover of the epistle's dominant theme and flow of thought from one Lord's
Day to the next enhances a dynamic, as opposed to a static, view of the
Christian's life, Beneath this method of preaching is the underlying philosophy
that all of life is spiritual. The mere randomness of topical preaching in which
a preacher takes a subject one week in one part of the Bible and an entirely
different topic the next week from another portion of Scripture, tends to
encourage a mindset in which it is easier to separate the sacred from the
secular dimension of life. That is not to say that topical preaching is
inappropriate. In fact. topical preaching is inherently theological, and because
few Christians have any idea of truth as a system (i.e. how it all connects
together in a consistent, unified whole), I will periodically preach a topical
message. God wrote the Bible. however, not as a systematic theology (i.e.
there is no one chapter in which the subject of justification is addressed
comprehensively). Sustained, verse-by verse preaching, therefore, is consistent
with the way the Lord gave us His word. The goal of biblical exposition is not,
however, the stringing together of a bunch of facts and trivia. The goal is to
lead to doctrine, to truth about God, Christ, salvation, and life that is
consistent with the rest of God's revelation in Scripture.
Granted, in today's "instant" society of sound bites and fifteen
second infomercials, sustained expository preaching runs cross grain to popular
preference. It takes too much effort to think connectedly. from one week to the
next. Modern man thinks in fragments. He wants everything condensed 10 the
bottom line and neatly packaged in a convenient, carry along. no-hassle
container so that he can add water and serve at his next spiritual pit-stop. The
sheer pace of our push-button lives has produced a culture in which virtually
everything is tolerated except long sermons. There is a growing distaste today
for the spiritual disciplines of study and solitude. Though our forbears sang,
'Take time to be holy: speak oft with thy God:' Americans today don't have time
to be holy. We are, in the words of Neil Postman, "amusing ourselves to
death:'
What should a preacher do when society at large has adopted a consumer mentality
toward everything in life, even the gospel' How should the church respond to the
modern demand for a spiritual "quick-kick" when that church has
historically served full-course family meals? Most people today are answering
that question by saying, "If there is a demand. we must supply it. We must
give the people what they want. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Interestingly, Paul addressed this very issue in 2 Timothy 4. When the time
comes that people will not tolerate sound doctrine but will select teachers
whose goal will be to tell them what they want to hear, Paul says to Timothy, continue
preaching the word (vs. 2-3). Timothy needed to remember that his philosophy of
ministry was determined by God, not market conditions. He had no right to edit
or amend the message to the selective tastes of his audience. Timothy, said
Paul, preach the word.
I believe in verse-by-verse preaching because it is the only way to fulfill the
charge to preach the word. It forces a minister to preach a full gospel-to
address issues that he would ordinarily bypass in favor of something less
controversial or more personality preferable. By verse-by-verse biblical
exposition, I am not. however, talking about a running commentary or lecture on
etymology and syntax. I'm talking about a view of preaching that sees it
primarily as the act of explaining what the passage means and then applying its
doctrinal principles to our lives today.
Personally, I am careful not to begin a sustained expository study that will
last for several weeks or months unless I have had a consistent burden toward
that particular portion of God's word for some time. Although all of God's word
is profitable (2 Tim. 3:16), I try to follow the Holy Spirit's leadership in
selecting preaching portions, for He alone knows what is most needed by our
congregation at any given moment. At times, even in the midst of a study, I will
also interrupt an extended series to bring a random message as I believe the
Lord directs.
Some have the mistaken notion, however, that the Spirit only guides on the spur
of the moment. They doubt that He would lead a preacher to systematically tackle
a book that may take several months to expound. Remember, however, that God is a
God of order and system. He made the universe in an orderly, structured, and
systematic way. Further, the Holy Spirit who authored the Bible, can certainly
direct a man to preach it according to the format in which He wrote it.
May I make a suggestion? If you will bring your Bible with you to public
worship, and follow the message visually as well as verbally, you will be amazed
at how much you will learn, and retain, and grow, I believe worship traditions
that are still built around the exposition of God's word as the central fare are
growing increasingly rare in our consumer-oriented society. In all candor, this
is a matter of conscience for me before God. Others may not share my conviction,
but in this day of famine for hearing the words of the Lord, I believe in the
priority of the expository preaching of God's word.